This post is more than 5 years old
92 Posts
0
1966
Unmapped BCV's
i have lot of devices of BCV Type which are under unmapped category ( bcv devices , bcv meta devices , bcv meta R1 devices )
and also i have bcv devices under mapped category..we are using TimeFinder/ SRDF for DR ..
1. i am wonder those devices which are under unmapped are ready to use for future ??? or those are currenty under use ??? ..
2. say if dev01 is attached to FA 13A -p 1 so the associated bcv for that standard device dev01 need to be mapped to same FA or no need
3.even can we change those device protection type like from BCV --> Raid ..
thank you...
and also i have bcv devices under mapped category..we are using TimeFinder/ SRDF for DR ..
1. i am wonder those devices which are under unmapped are ready to use for future ??? or those are currenty under use ??? ..
2. say if dev01 is attached to FA 13A -p 1 so the associated bcv for that standard device dev01 need to be mapped to same FA or no need
3.even can we change those device protection type like from BCV --> Raid ..
thank you...
xe2sdc
2.8K Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 13:00
unmapped are ready to use for future ??? or those are
currenty under use ??? ..
As Mr Dynamox said, a BCV is always a BCV .. it's always available in case you need to establish it. Sometimes customer prefer NOT to map BCV devices to be completly sure that their content will never ever be touched from someone ..
associated bcv for that standard device dev01 need to
be mapped to same FA or no need
See above .. no need
like from BCV --> Raid ..
If the devices are already BCV+R-5 then YES you can convert them to RAID-5 devices .. If the BCV are unprotected BCV or 2-way-mir BCV then the quick answer is NO, the complex answer is yes but with care
thank you...
pctech321
92 Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 13:00
for that if i create a device group then which BCV devices do i need to pick from
those bcv list because if they are not mapped to FA the symdev XXXX -noport will give us
big lit of bcv's how can we determine which are currently under use or which are available (free )..
thank you.....
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
1
January 4th, 2008 13:00
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 14:00
Time of last BCV will tell you when it was last use ...maybe you can determine by date that something was used long time ago ..but not anymore. And State of pair may return "NeverEstab" ..which means that BCV was never used at all.
xe2sdc
2.8K Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 14:00
As you said, grep[ping] -i for NeverEst will show you the list of bcv never established ..
symbcv will show you also the meta-members so maybe you have to filter further the output of symbcv list to have only meta heads ..
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 14:00
pctech321
92 Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 16:00
so at any time all these four devices should have same data and of same size, exactly like mirroring...right
thank you..
pctech321
92 Posts
0
January 4th, 2008 16:00
thank you....
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 5th, 2008 05:00
them are showing never established & time of last BCV
action N/A .so those are available BCVs for future
...i have one doubt , if standard dev & local BCV
is of size 9 Gig then remote (R2)standard dev & R2
bcvs should be in same or bigger size right ..
so at any time all these four devices should have
same data and of same size, exactly like
mirroring...right
thank you..
that's correct, starting with microcode 69, R2 can be larger than R1. I would look at Solution Enabler guide to check the restrictions when using R2 that are larger than R1 ..for example you can not use concatenated metas ..only striped.
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 5th, 2008 05:00
so device column shows you your device id and which rhdiskpower# it's associated to.
xe2sdc
2.8K Posts
0
January 5th, 2008 15:00
larger than R1. I would look at Solution Enabler
guide to check the restrictions when using R2 that
are larger than R1 ..for example you can not use
concatenated metas ..only striped.
My 2 cents .. please avoid R2 devices larger then R1 devices and BCV/clones larger then the source .. :-D
And have fun with TimeFinder and SRDF
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 5th, 2008 20:00
xe2sdc
2.8K Posts
0
January 6th, 2008 11:00
pctech321
92 Posts
0
January 7th, 2008 09:00
In my case i found all of devices (standard , local bcv , remote bcvs ) of same size , if i run
symdg show devgrp_name
below is stripped output ...i seen standard & bcv at local and bcv at remote devices but didn't
seen standard device list at remote site for this device group ..is there any command to look at those devices
& i read EMC SRDF document for my company in that i found srdf mode is adaptive copy but here i seen
adaptive copy mode is disabled so by this output my SRDF is synchrounous right now??
Standard (STD) Devices (2):
XXXXXXX
BCV Devices Locally-associated (2):
XXXXXX
BCV Devices Remotely-associated (BCV RDF) (2):
XXXXX
Device Group BCV RDF Information
XXXXX
RDF Mode : Synchronous
RDF Adaptive Copy : Disabled
RDF Adaptive Copy Write Pending State : N/A
RDF Adaptive Copy Skew (Tracks) : 65535
thank you..
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 7th, 2008 10:00
for example: C.D ..which stands for adaptive copy disk mode.