Start a Conversation

This post is more than 5 years old

Solved!

Go to Solution

1605

August 17th, 2009 00:00

HBA Relpacement on sun solaris

Hi all ,

we will change 2 HBAs on a Sun Host "solaris 9" from emulex to qlogic QLA2460?
should we consider a change in the device names "c#t#d#s#" if the native names were been used in the Volume manger or application or DBMS? or the appliction will take it automatically

Thanks in advance

265 Posts

August 21st, 2009 16:00

1 Rookie

 • 

118 Posts

August 22nd, 2009 02:00

Thanks GF

2 Intern

 • 

2.8K Posts

August 24th, 2009 02:00

Solaris is quite different from HPUX. With Solaris you have to check your path_to_inst file. Solaris will change only the c# number since t#d# depends on the SAN and the storage port. If the new HBA will replace old one in path_to_inst, you'll have same c# ...

1 Rookie

 • 

118 Posts

August 29th, 2009 19:00

what is path_to_inst file ?
and do i have to remove hba from power path before removing it physically?
also since we have asm application ... is there a recommended steps we must follows?

2 Intern

 • 

2.8K Posts

August 31st, 2009 02:00

I bet Sun may explain what is path_to_inst ;-)

http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5174/path-to-inst-4?a=view

http://www.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/2004-October/005800.html

If cXtYdZ won't change, ASM won't ever notice you replaced HBAs. I'm not an ASM expert thus can't advice how to reconfigure ASM in case cXtYdZ changes.

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

September 3rd, 2009 05:00

you dont need to remove HBA from PP. But after you replace the HBA the LUNS need to remasked to new HBA/WWN so that host can see devices once again.

The ASM config changes depend on your envioronment. In our setup we have a dependency with the paths(cXtYdZ) to the ASM devices so we have to point the ASM devices to new paths if there is a change.

1 Rookie

 • 

118 Posts

September 6th, 2009 04:00

i mean asm uses emcpower not the cXtYdZ
:)

1 Rookie

 • 

118 Posts

September 6th, 2009 04:00

But if the
emcpower names changed and the cXtYdZ also changed
and we renamed it "emcpower" back by emcpadm util
and asm uses the emcpower devices ...will it be ok? without looking at the
cXtYdZ

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

September 20th, 2009 00:00

i would go with YES; Dont you have a chance to test that in DEV environment
No Events found!

Top