Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
66 Posts
0
17008
July 27th, 2012 16:00
Help with Hard Drive Install on R3
I just added a 2tb seagate drive in my R3. I put it in the bay under the factory installed 2tb drive. I attached the power and interface connectors. I rebooted and the new drive is not showing up when I select computer. It only shows the factory drive. Is there some bios setting I need to change? Thanks
No Events found!


DELL-Chris M
Community Manager
•
56.9K Posts
•
232.1K Points
0
July 27th, 2012 16:00
MG1959,
Restart the system, press DEL to enter the System Setup. Go to Advanced- Standard CMOS Features. All of the SATA ports will be listed. Does the added drive appear in the list?
Tesla1856
10 Wizard
•
17.9K Posts
•
71.1K Points
0
July 27th, 2012 16:00
You have to setup the drive in Control Panel / Admin Tools / Computer Mgnt / Storage / Disc Mgnt.
http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/15/how-to-configure-a-new-hard-drive-in-windows-7/
MG1959
66 Posts
0
July 27th, 2012 17:00
Chirs/Tesla:
I got the drive initialized and ran the windows back up and restore to get an image of the primary drive. It took me awhile but I eventually found disk management and figured that out. My 2 hard drives show in the CMOS as sata 1 and sata 2. I hope I'm good there and didnt mess anything up.
Is there a way to see if the hard drives are running sata 3 with the 6gb transfer rate? Thanks for the help on a friday evening.
Tesla1856
10 Wizard
•
17.9K Posts
•
71.1K Points
0
July 27th, 2012 22:00
Try CrystalDiskInfo
crystalmark.info
or CrystalDiskMark to see if transfer speeds are about right.
MG1959
66 Posts
0
July 28th, 2012 05:00
Tesla:
can you tell me if these scores look correct for sata 3 performance. The c drive looks half as fast as the new F drive I installed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 156.714 MB/s
Sequential Write : 156.341 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 51.200 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 85.528 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 0.603 MB/s [ 147.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.254 MB/s [ 306.1 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 1.398 MB/s [ 341.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 1.283 MB/s [ 313.3 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [F: 11.9% (221.6/1863.0 GB)] (x2)
Date : 2012/07/28 7:27:57
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 84.754 MB/s
Sequential Write : 82.151 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 22.361 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 46.352 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 0.184 MB/s [ 44.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.816 MB/s [ 199.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 0.871 MB/s [ 212.7 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.804 MB/s [ 196.3 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [C: 4.4% (81.3/1849.3 GB)] (x2)
Date : 2012/07/28 7:32:43
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Tesla1856
10 Wizard
•
17.9K Posts
•
71.1K Points
0
July 28th, 2012 16:00
Right, new drives are faster than old drives. Pretty cool, huh? I think it's the additional on-board cache.
I doubt a "spinning drive" could saturate a SATA2-300 port, much less a SATA3-600 port. Therefore, I don't think it matters where you connect them. SSDs are a different story.
CrystalDiskInfo should list the Interface type specs. On an Aurora-R3, only 1 or 2 SATA ports are SATA3-600. The motherboard headers should be a different color. Also, check PDF manuals.
MG1959
66 Posts
0
July 29th, 2012 07:00
Thanks, Tesla. The only thing confusing me is the primary drive that came with the system is Barracuda XT, the one I installed isn't the XT, but it's faster. Just makes me wonder if the primary is not optimized. However I don't know what to check for and do if it can be optimized.
Tesla1856
10 Wizard
•
17.9K Posts
•
71.1K Points
0
July 29th, 2012 13:00
Built a proper speadsheet and really dig-into the specs. You will see why the new one is faster. I bet it's the cache (seen it before). I used to switch drives around for this reason ... but now, using an SSD for boot/OS drive makes more sense (if looking for speed).
Make sure old drive is degragged and none of the SMART data is outta-wack. Remember to check Google.