Synopsis:
PowerProtect DD Virtual edition provides unmatched performance and TCO for customers seeking the benefits of a Data Domain appliance in a virtual form factor. However, care must be taken before deploying PowerProtect DDVE in certain types of environments as this might cause an increase in metadata usage over the prescribed guideline, thereby affecting the TCO experienced by the user. The increase in metadata resulting from the scenarios discussed below is a natural consequence of high deduplication as the product is working per design and we highly recommend that you assess the potential impact of the below scenarios on the TCO prior to deployment.Scenario 1: Virtual Synthetic File System backups
Protecting File System backups on PowerProtect DDVE using a backup application (such as Avamar) with Virtual Synthetic backups enabled might lead to a situation where the customer experiences a high deduplication ratio, at the cost of increased metadata usage. A high effective deduplication rate exerts a downward pressure on TCO, while increased metadata usage exerts an upward pressure. The resolution of these forces determines the overall TCO experienced by the user. It is important to assess prior to deployment, if the user s environment has this type of workload.Scenario 2: Partial Containers
Writing partial containers to the object store, which might be caused due to frequent commits or by writing small files (<1 MB) increases the metadata overhead of the system. In this scenario, this spike is temporary, and the system can be brought to steady state by running cleaning, which will copy forward the partial containers and eliminate the fragmentation. However, it should be noted there is a cost associated with running cleaning, which might affect TCO if run too often. The best practice guideline is to run cleaning once a week and size the metadata disks accordingly.Scenario 3: Small Files
In cases where the user s environment has millions of small files (<1 MB), the metadata overhead is high compared to the data. This is an unsupported workload and DDVE might not be the right solution to protect such workloads.Scenario 4: Dense Markers
Certain apps such as Oracle or Commvault introduce markers in the backup stream. DDVE deduplicates these markers, leading to high dedupe rates. Once again, the user is faced with a tradeoff between a high deduplication rate at the expense of increased metadata usage. The user can choose to turn off in-app optimization in the backup app and reduce DDVE metadata usage or choose the higher deduplication rates at the expense of increased metadata usage.Scenario 5: Non-Virtual Synthetic backups with high deduplication rates
This scenario is uncommon, and the user needs to be aware about the potential impact to TCO due to the highSummary
In the specific scenarios described above, we expect that there will be significant increase in the meta datasysadmin@atos-ddve# filesys show space tier active local-metadata Active Tier: local-metadata usage Size GiB Used GiB Avail GiB Use% -------- -------- --------- ----- 24290.4 4390.2 19900.2 18.0% -------- -------- --------- -----