Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

2 Intern

 • 

211 Posts

5015

September 10th, 2014 03:00

help on " symcfg list -tdev -detail " output

Hi All,

It seems that the device 0FA3 is falling into 2 pools , FC_T1 and ATA_T2, why is the device 0FA3 shown in 2 pools? Is it a thin device or a volume in VMAX? is FC_T1 and ATA_T2 a thin pool or storage group, respectively?  Appreciate your guides.

# symcfg list -tdev  -detail -dev 0FA3

Symmetrix ID: 1234

Enabled Capacity (Tracks) : 2672912640

Bound   Capacity (Tracks) :    2209680

                  S Y M M E T R I X   T H I N   D E V I C E S      

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                   Pool        Pool          Total         

                  Flags     Total  Subs     Allocated       Written           

Sym  Pool Name    EMSP     Tracks    (%)  Tracks  (%)  Tracks   (%) Status  

---- ------------ ----- --------- ----- --------- --- --------- --- -----------

0FA3 FC_T1        FX..    2209680     0         0   0   1269492  57 Bound     

          ATA_T2       --.-          -     -   1269624  57         -   - -         

Total                   --------- ----- --------- --- --------- ---

Tracks                    2209680     0   1269624   0   1269492   0

2 Intern

 • 

211 Posts

September 10th, 2014 04:00

a thin device can belong to more than one pool! that is new to me.

Now, please help me, how come can a thin device belong to two different type of storages? I thought the thin device will be assigned to a host, then which means the data on it could be located on  either  FC_T1 or ATA_T2 drives?

121 Posts

September 10th, 2014 04:00

Slight correction. A TDEV can only bound to ONE pool. (You can check the binding with "symdev show"). However if the device is under FAST VP control, data can be moved to any pool that is part of the applied FAST VP policy.

2 Intern

 • 

211 Posts

September 10th, 2014 05:00

Thanks for clarification, KW160!

I noticed that you used FAST VP, not 'FAST". Is that correct only in FAST VP that data on 0F3A (LUN) can be located on different pools, and if in FAST, then it can only located in one pool, since FAST cannot move sub-lun?

1 Message

September 10th, 2014 21:00

Yeah you tend to use FAST VP for extent wise movement of data across pools (hence we have the tdev showing association with more than one pool in your above output), where as if you use FAST, the entire device will be moved.

No Events found!

Top