This post is more than 5 years old
108 Posts
0
956
Diskxtender with Centera
Hi,
Is anyone using Diskxtender with Centera storage and multi-target media groups? For resilience we'd like to use this setup to write simultaneously to 2 Centeras, but we are wondering how well this works.
Thanks,
Sheppie
Is anyone using Diskxtender with Centera storage and multi-target media groups? For resilience we'd like to use this setup to write simultaneously to 2 Centeras, but we are wondering how well this works.
Thanks,
Sheppie
fschlupp
397 Posts
0
January 9th, 2007 17:00
Having said that unless you are using clustered servers to host DiskXtender you still have a single point of failure. Another approach would be to use Replistor to replicate files between two DX servers each independently writing files out to the Centeras.
xvan_egmond
74 Posts
1
December 24th, 2006 02:00
are you sure you want to use centera? We have a setup with comvault migrator and the performance of the centera is really terrible. Although it is connected to a 2Gbit highway, the write and read performance is at about 2MB/s and this seems to be what is expected of the centera in this case.\
Centera is meant for archiving data not to be accessed regularly not as a third tier of storage. Perhaps you could better use a celerra of clariion with 500GB sata for that.
However in answer to your question, we do not use diskxtender but comvault. We use a second media-agent (say storagenode) for use with the remote data and data is copied through the comserver to this other media-agentcomcell. If one site fails, we just need to start comserver on the other agent. This would not work with networker, but maybe it will with diskxtender, I do not have any knowledge of that....
Hope it helps.
sheppie
108 Posts
0
January 4th, 2007 02:00
I realise that the Centera is an archiving solution and that is the way we would be using it. I was just interesting in getting more info about using diskxtender with multi-target media groups as opposed to using centera replication.
I'm unable to find any information on which of this methods is better for ensuring resilience across 2 Centeras.
Regards,
Sheppie
sheppie
108 Posts
0
January 17th, 2007 09:00
We are using Centera replication but since it is asynchronous there is always the chance of data loss if the primary Centera is lost before it has had a chance to replicate to the secondary.
I thought multi-target media groups might get around this limitation by writing to both Centeras simultaneously. If one Centera went down the data would still be available from the other.
Regards,
Sheppie